Green Hydrogen and Ammonia: Implications for MN and Beyond

Reese Photo 2013 1

Mike Reese, the Renewable Energy Director at the University of Minnesota West Central Research and Outreach Center (WCROC) addressed the Rural MN Energy Board on Monday afternoon via Zoom. His presentation was titled, “Green Hydrogen & Ammonia: Implications for MN & Beyond.” His presentation explored the potential  economic development opportunities around producing green hydrogen and ammonia in Minnesota.

The U of M West Central Research and Outreach Center, Morris, has been a forerunner in the development and use of “Green Ammonia” since they built the first-in-the-world renewable hydrogen and ammonia pilot plant on campus. The novel pilot plant uses wind power from a 1.65 MW wind turbine to produce up to 25 tons of nitrogen fertilizer (anhydrous ammonia) each year on-site, which is enough to cover approximately 300 acres of cropland.

Reese explained that transitioning green nitrogen fertilizer is a key element to improving the carbon footprint within production agriculture. He cited that 20% to 25% of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the world are attributed to agriculture. Likewise, 2% of GHG emission comes from ammonia and nitrogen.

The discussion led to talking about the need to decarbonize MidwestiIndustry and utilities using zero-carbon hydrogen. Wind and solar can be used to produce green hydrogen which then can be converted into urea fertilizer or the ammonia. Researches at the WCROC have shown the potential for ammonia as an alternative fuel for grain dryers, tractors, and trucks. Green hydrogen can also be used as a renewable diesel, jet fuel (SAF), methanol, and ethanol. It requires capturing, and recycling, carbon dioxide, normally emitted via fermentation to produce the fuels. A switch to hydrogen and ammonia can fuel trucks, mining equipment, tractors, train engines, and ships. Meanwhile displaced energy can be used in processing ore into iron pellets as well as the carbon purification process within steel making currently responsible for 8% of global GHG emissions.

One challenge in the production of nitrogen fertilizer is that the process is water intensive using roughly 2.3 tons of water per ton of ammonia produced. Some, however, is recovered. Currently most ammonia is produced in the southern gulf states. Louisiana tops the charts producing over 4 million tons.

Other barriers include: electrolyzer supply, scale, financing, developing the right partners, storage (anhydrous ammonia vs urea), experience in the field, price/risk management, and sophisticated competition.

Producing green ammonia in Minnesota makes economic sense. Farmers, in the state, spend between $500 millon to $1 billion per year on nitrogen fertilizer. Reese stated that if green nitrogen was implemented, there is a chance farmers could have ownership in it through cooperatives.

Reese shared that stated US nitrogen fertilizer demand could be met with approximately 50,000 MW of nameplate wind energy capacity - current US wind generation is 105,583 MW of nameplate capacity.

The WCROC recently secured $18.6 million to scale-up their original wind to ammonia to produce one metric ton per day, 18 times their current capacity.

Reese continued, “It all boils down to whether it works economically or not.”

The Inflation Reduction Act provides a $3/kg of hydrogen production incentive with direct pay option and this has dramatically changed the playing field making production and use economical. Additionally farmer-owned cooperatives could utilize renewable hydrogen for the production of anhydrous ammonia, urea, methanol, sustainable aviation fuel, and other molecules.

The question remains on the interest in the area and how to move forward from here.

Translate »
Scroll to Top